Robotics & Field Automation
Robotics: For Farmers
What Robotics changes for the person actually doing the work.
For the person running the business, the test of any farm software is whether it removes work or adds it. Field robotics and automation address real UK constraints — labour availability, soil compaction and precision at scale — but the sector has a difficult commercial record. This module appraises robotic options honestly against the operation they replace, manages trials and shared access, and tracks the regulatory position that governs autonomous operation.
In their words
What the job actually looks like
These are not marketing personas. Each one is a distinct job with a distinct constraint, and the module is designed so that solving one does not create work for the others.
Horticultural grower
Labour constrained
Needs a realistic comparison against seasonal labour cost and availability.
- Define the operation and its current cost
- Identify candidate robotic solutions
- Assess supplier viability and support
- Arrange a trial or shared access
Arable innovator
Trialling autonomous platforms
Needs structured measurement rather than impression.
- Identify candidate robotic solutions
- Assess supplier viability and support
- Arrange a trial or shared access
- Measure performance against a control
Contractor
Offering robotic services
Needs utilisation high enough to justify the capital.
- Assess supplier viability and support
- Arrange a trial or shared access
- Measure performance against a control
- Model total cost of ownership
End to end
How Robotics runs, start to finish
The module is modelled as a state machine, so at any point the business knows exactly which stage every record is at and what has to happen next.
-
1
Define the operation and its current cost
This is where the record starts, and getting it right here removes work at every later stage.
-
2
Identify candidate robotic solutions
The platform prompts only for what this stage genuinely needs, and carries everything forward.
-
3
Assess supplier viability and support
Conflicts with scheme rules, regulatory windows and existing commitments are flagged here rather than discovered later.
-
4
Arrange a trial or shared access
Capture works offline, so this stage is completed in the field rather than remembered afterwards.
-
5
Measure performance against a control
Everything recorded at this point becomes evidence automatically, in every format that will later ask for it.
-
6
Model total cost of ownership
This is the stage most businesses currently do twice, once for the operation and once for the paperwork.
-
7
Decide adopt, share or decline
Results feed the whole-farm view, so the effect of this stage is visible against the rest of the business.
-
8
Review annually as the sector moves
The cycle closes here, and what is learned is carried into next season's plan rather than lost.
Capabilities
What Robotics does
Every capability below is built on the same underlying record, so entering something once is enough for it to appear wherever it is needed.
Record and plan
- Robotic and autonomous system appraisal against the operation replaced
- Labour substitution modelling with availability and cost inputs
- Trial management with structured performance measurement
Operate and monitor
- Shared access and contracting arrangements rather than outright purchase
- Autonomous operation safety case and risk assessment records
- Compaction benefit modelling from lighter autonomous platforms
Comply and evidence
- Mechanical and laser weeding performance recording
- Robotic milking and feeding integration with the livestock modules
- Automated harvesting trial recording for horticultural crops
Analyse and improve
- Supplier viability assessment given the sector failure record
- Grant alignment with automation and robotics funding rounds
- Total cost of ownership including support, downtime and obsolescence risk
Find
Find contractors and dealers
Filter by type, nation, distance and accreditation. Results are ranked by relevance to your holding once your holding record exists, and alphabetically before that.
6 records shown from the platform’s own register
- Module Machinery, Fleet & Contracting Flagship
- Module Precision Agriculture, Guidance & Variable Rate Core
- Module Robotics & Field Automation Core
- Module Drones & Aerial Survey Core
- Module Satellite & Remote Sensing Core
- Module IoT Sensors & Rural Connectivity Core
Worked example
How a business like yours would use Robotics
The problem: Needs a realistic comparison against seasonal labour cost and availability.
What they do
- Define the operation and its current cost
- Identify candidate robotic solutions
- Assess supplier viability and support
- Arrange a trial or shared access
What changes
- Hours of labour substituted
- Cost per hectare against conventional
- Uptime percentage
This is an illustrative worked example built from the module design, not a customer reference. Named case studies are published only with the business's written consent.
What we are hearing
The problems people describe to us
These are composite statements drawn from user research conversations, not attributed customer quotes. We publish named references only with written consent.
I am not short of software. I am short of one place where the same field means the same thing in all of it.
The scheme closed on a Tuesday evening. I had the application half built. Nobody told me the budget was nearly gone.
We farm on both sides of the border. Everything takes twice as long and I still cannot see the whole position on one screen.
Audit week costs me three days. Every single record they ask for is already written down somewhere on this farm.
Measurement
How you will know it is working
The module reports against these measures from the day it is switched on, so the value is demonstrable rather than assumed.
- 01Hours of labour substituted
- 02Cost per hectare against conventional
- 03Uptime percentage
- 04Trial completion rate
- 05Compaction reduction achieved
Free assessment
Find out where you stand in about ten minutes
A structured assessment producing a scored report with a prioritised list of what to fix first, and what it is worth fixing.