Peatland & Paludiculture
Peatland: Rules & Compliance
The rules that apply, the evidence they demand and how it is assembled.
Compliance in UK farming is mostly a records problem rather than a practice problem — the work is usually done correctly and evidenced badly. Drained lowland peat and degraded upland peat are the single largest agricultural emissions source per hectare in the UK, and restoration is now among the best-funded land use changes available. This module maps peat depth and condition, models restoration and water table options, manages Peatland Code project registration, and appraises paludiculture as a productive alternative to abandonment.
Detail
The regulatory position
Drained lowland peat and degraded upland peat are the single largest agricultural emissions source per hectare in the UK, and restoration is now among the best-funded land use changes available. This module maps peat depth and condition, models restoration and water table options, manages Peatland Code project registration, and appraises paludiculture as a productive alternative to abandonment.
The Climate Change Committee's Balanced Pathway recommends 55 per cent of peatlands restored or re-wetted by 2040, up from 23 per cent in 2023. The Peatland Code has recorded 408 registered projects covering 58,860 hectares and 12.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, with an average unit price of £39.57 in 2025 — although that average is skewed by a small number of large transactions and rests on voluntary disclosure.
Everything Peatland records is written into the same platform data spine as every other module, which is why a single entry can satisfy an operational need, a scheme evidence requirement, an assurance clause and a carbon activity line at once. That is the whole design premise: the work is already being done, and it is the recording of it that is duplicated.
Before you start
What you will need, and what the module handles for you
Most of this comes across automatically once your holding is registered. The list is here so nothing arrives as a surprise.
Eligibility check
Could your holding claim for peatland?
Four questions, no account, no email. The check reports what the published rules say and flags where they are open to interpretation — it is not a decision, and it is not advice.
What the check can tell you
-
Appears to meet the published criteria
On what you have told us, the published eligibility rules appear to be met. The next step is to confirm against the current scheme guidance and check the window is open.
-
Depends on something we cannot see
Your answers hit a condition that turns on detail we have not asked for — commonly tenancy consent, a parcel-level designation, or an overlapping agreement. The check names which condition it is.
-
Does not appear to qualify as described
One of the published criteria appears not to be met. The check says which one, because criteria change and because there is often an alternative scheme that does fit.
Schemes and funding
Support schemes this module works with
Agrivencia holds these schemes as data, so eligibility, payment rates, caps and windows update the day they change rather than at the next software release.
Peatland Code
Provide a standard for peatland restoration projects generating verifiable carbon units.
IUCN UK Peatland Programme EnglandNature for Climate Peatland Restoration
Fund peatland restoration in England to reduce emissions and improve condition.
Defra / Natural England EnglandCountryside Stewardship
Fund more complex, targeted and bespoke habitat management than the main incentive offer supports.
Defra / Natural England / Rural Payments Agency ScotlandPeatland ACTION
Fund peatland restoration across Scotland.
NatureScot and partnersRates, caps and windows change frequently and sometimes without notice. Always confirm against the current published scheme rules before applying.
Find
Find surveyors and laboratories
Filter by type, nation, distance and accreditation. Results are ranked by relevance to your holding once your holding record exists, and alphabetically before that.
5 records shown from the platform’s own register
- Module Soil Health & Structure Flagship
- Module Soil Carbon & Organic Matter Core
- Module Land, Mapping & Field Boundaries Flagship
- Module Tenancy, Tenure & Land Markets Core
- Module Peatland & Paludiculture Core
Risks, stated plainly
What could go wrong, and what we do about it
Every one of these is a real constraint rather than a hypothetical. They are listed because a platform that hides them is harder to trust than one that names them.
| The risk | What we do about it |
|---|---|
| Long verification lag before income | modelled explicitly in cashflow |
| Permanence obligations over decades | surfaced at commitment |
| Price averages skewed by large transactions | disclosed rather than presented as market rate |
How we handle evidence
Where these figures come from
Agrivencia grades every figure it publishes. Primary legislation, official statistics and audit reports are treated as authoritative. Levy body and professional body data is treated as reliable. Commercial trackers and trade press are treated as indicative and labelled as such. Where sources conflict, the conflict is shown rather than resolved silently.
- Authoritative Legislation, statutory instruments, official scheme rules, national audit and public accounts reporting, departmental annual reports and accredited official statistics.
- Reliable Parliamentary committee evidence, peer-reviewed research, independent economic institutes and levy body analysis.
- Supporting Professional bodies, land agents, certification schemes and industry associations.
- Indicative Commercial market trackers and trade press, used for corroboration only and always labelled.
Payment rates, caps and windows in UK farm support change frequently and sometimes without notice. Nothing on this platform is a substitute for the current published scheme rules or for professional advice.
Questions answered
What people ask about Peatland
Does this replace the software I already use?
Not necessarily. Agrivencia integrates with authoritative sources and mainstream packages rather than insisting on replacing them. Where an incumbent does one job well, the platform connects to it; where the job spans several systems and nobody does it, the platform does it.
Will it work where I have no signal?
Yes. Field capture in Peatland is offline first, storing locally and synchronising when a connection returns. Only around a fifth of UK farms report reliable signal across the whole holding, so this is a design assumption rather than a feature.
What happens when the scheme rules change?
Scheme rules are held as data rather than code, so a rate change, a cap change or a window closure is a content update that takes effect the same day. The platform also alerts you to what the change does to your own position.
Who owns the data I put in?
You do. The Farm Data Charter gives you a complete export in open formats at any time, and every instance of data sharing requires an explicit, revocable consent that is visible in your account.
Does it work if I farm across a border?
Yes, and that is one of the main reasons the platform exists. A business with land in more than one nation sees one reconciled view rather than two portals, with obligations and deadlines from both administrations in a single calendar.
Can my agronomist or land agent use it too?
Yes. You grant scoped, time-limited access per holding and per module, and you can revoke it in one click. Advisers never get a shared password or a blanket view.
What is the biggest limitation of this module?
Long verification lag before income. Modelled explicitly in cashflow. We would rather state that plainly than let you discover it after signing.
See Peatland running on your own holding
Thirty minutes, using your parcels, your schemes and your enterprises rather than a sample farm. No obligation and no sales script — if it does not fit your business we will say so.
- Free tier available
- No card required
- Your data stays yours